Stripped-envelope supernova light curves argue for central engine activity
‘Osmar Rodr’iguez, Ehud Nakar, Dan Maoz
arXiv:2404.10846v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The luminosity of “stripped-envelope supernovae”, a common type of stellar explosions, has been generally thought to be driven by the radioactive decay of the nickel synthesized in the explosion and carried in its ejecta. Additional possible energy sources have been previously suggested, but these claims have been statistically inconclusive or model-dependent. Here, we analyse the energy budget of a sample of 54 well-observed stripped-envelope supernovae of all sub-types, and present statistically significant, largely model-independent, observational evidence for a non-radioactive power source in most of them (and possibly in all). We consider various energy sources, or alternatively, plausible systematic errors, that could drive this result, and conclude that the most likely option is the existence of a “central engine”, such as a magnetar (a highly magnetic neutron star) or an accreting neutron star or black hole, operating over hours to days after the explosion. We infer from the observations constraints on the engines, finding that if these are magnetars, then their initial magnetic fields are about $10^{15},$G and their initial rotation period is 1–100 ms, implying that stripped-envelope supernovae could be the formative events of magnetars.arXiv:2404.10846v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: The luminosity of “stripped-envelope supernovae”, a common type of stellar explosions, has been generally thought to be driven by the radioactive decay of the nickel synthesized in the explosion and carried in its ejecta. Additional possible energy sources have been previously suggested, but these claims have been statistically inconclusive or model-dependent. Here, we analyse the energy budget of a sample of 54 well-observed stripped-envelope supernovae of all sub-types, and present statistically significant, largely model-independent, observational evidence for a non-radioactive power source in most of them (and possibly in all). We consider various energy sources, or alternatively, plausible systematic errors, that could drive this result, and conclude that the most likely option is the existence of a “central engine”, such as a magnetar (a highly magnetic neutron star) or an accreting neutron star or black hole, operating over hours to days after the explosion. We infer from the observations constraints on the engines, finding that if these are magnetars, then their initial magnetic fields are about $10^{15},$G and their initial rotation period is 1–100 ms, implying that stripped-envelope supernovae could be the formative events of magnetars.