Machine Learning Supports Existence of Previously Unrecognized Transient Astronomical Phenomena in Historical Observatory Images
Stephen Bruehl, Brian Doherty, Alina Streblyanska, Beatriz Villarroel
arXiv:2604.18799v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Transient, star-like point sources that appear and vanish over short timescales are described in astronomical images prior to launch of Sputnik. We have reported that transient numbers diminish significantly in Earth’s shadow (shadow deficit) and are more likely within (plus/minus) one day of nuclear testing (nuclear window). These findings remain debated with some arguing that transients identified via existing automated pipelines are simply plate defects. Therefore, we use machine learning (ML) to enhance transient identification accuracy and validate the phenomenon. The model was trained against 250 transient image pairs taken 30 minutes apart that were classified as real versus plate defect by expert visual review; the model demonstrated good discrimination (out-of-fold AUC$=$0.81; sensitivity$=$0.71, specificity$=$0.71). After deployment in a dataset of 107,875 previously-identified transients, the model assigned each a probability of being real. After controlling for ML-identified artifacts, transient counts were significantly elevated for dates within a nuclear window (p$=$.024); transients with the highest probability of being real were more likely to occur within a nuclear window (p$arXiv:2604.18799v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Transient, star-like point sources that appear and vanish over short timescales are described in astronomical images prior to launch of Sputnik. We have reported that transient numbers diminish significantly in Earth’s shadow (shadow deficit) and are more likely within (plus/minus) one day of nuclear testing (nuclear window). These findings remain debated with some arguing that transients identified via existing automated pipelines are simply plate defects. Therefore, we use machine learning (ML) to enhance transient identification accuracy and validate the phenomenon. The model was trained against 250 transient image pairs taken 30 minutes apart that were classified as real versus plate defect by expert visual review; the model demonstrated good discrimination (out-of-fold AUC$=$0.81; sensitivity$=$0.71, specificity$=$0.71). After deployment in a dataset of 107,875 previously-identified transients, the model assigned each a probability of being real. After controlling for ML-identified artifacts, transient counts were significantly elevated for dates within a nuclear window (p$=$.024); transients with the highest probability of being real were more likely to occur within a nuclear window (p$

Comments are closed, but trackbacks and pingbacks are open.