Determining the $^{56}$Ni distribution of type Ia supernovae from observations within days of explosion. (arXiv:1912.07603v1 [astro-ph.HE])
<a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Magee_M/0/1/0/all/0/1">M. R. Magee</a> (1), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Maguire_K/0/1/0/all/0/1">K. Maguire</a> (1), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Kotak_R/0/1/0/all/0/1">R. Kotak</a> (2), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Sim_S/0/1/0/all/0/1">S. A. Sim</a> (3), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Gillanders_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">J. H. Gillanders</a> (3), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Prentice_S/0/1/0/all/0/1">S. J. Prentice</a> (1), <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Skillen_K/0/1/0/all/0/1">K. Skillen</a> (1) ((1) Trinity College Dublin, (2) University of Turku, (3) Queen's University Belfast)
Recent studies have shown how the distribution of $^{56}$Ni within the ejecta
of type Ia supernovae can have profound consequences on the observed light
curves. Observations at early times can therefore provide important details on
the explosion physics in thermonuclear supernovae. We present a series of
radiative transfer calculations that explore variations in the $^{56}$Ni
distribution. Our models also show the importance of the density profile in
shaping the light curve, which is often neglected in the literature. Using our
model set, we investigate the observations that are necessary to determine the
$^{56}$Ni distribution as robustly as possible within the current model set. We
find that this includes observations beginning at least $sim$14 days before
$B$-band maximum, extending to approximately maximum light with a high
($lesssim$3 day) cadence, and in at least one blue and one red band are
required (such as $B$ and $R$, or $g$ and $r$). We compare a number of
well-observed type Ia supernovae that meet these criteria to our models and
find that the light curves of $sim$70-80% of objects in our sample are
consistent with being produced solely by variations in the $^{56}$Ni
distributions. The remaining supernovae show an excess of flux at early times,
indicating missing physics that is not accounted for within our model set, such
as an interaction or the presence of short-lived radioactive isotopes.
Comparing our model light curves and spectra to observations and delayed
detonation models demonstrates that while a somewhat extended $^{56}$Ni
distribution is necessary to reproduce the observed light curve shape, this
does not negatively affect the spectra at maximum light. Investigating current
explosion models shows that observations typically require a shallower decrease
in the $^{56}$Ni mass towards the outer ejecta than is produced for models of a
given $^{56}$Ni mass.
Recent studies have shown how the distribution of $^{56}$Ni within the ejecta
of type Ia supernovae can have profound consequences on the observed light
curves. Observations at early times can therefore provide important details on
the explosion physics in thermonuclear supernovae. We present a series of
radiative transfer calculations that explore variations in the $^{56}$Ni
distribution. Our models also show the importance of the density profile in
shaping the light curve, which is often neglected in the literature. Using our
model set, we investigate the observations that are necessary to determine the
$^{56}$Ni distribution as robustly as possible within the current model set. We
find that this includes observations beginning at least $sim$14 days before
$B$-band maximum, extending to approximately maximum light with a high
($lesssim$3 day) cadence, and in at least one blue and one red band are
required (such as $B$ and $R$, or $g$ and $r$). We compare a number of
well-observed type Ia supernovae that meet these criteria to our models and
find that the light curves of $sim$70-80% of objects in our sample are
consistent with being produced solely by variations in the $^{56}$Ni
distributions. The remaining supernovae show an excess of flux at early times,
indicating missing physics that is not accounted for within our model set, such
as an interaction or the presence of short-lived radioactive isotopes.
Comparing our model light curves and spectra to observations and delayed
detonation models demonstrates that while a somewhat extended $^{56}$Ni
distribution is necessary to reproduce the observed light curve shape, this
does not negatively affect the spectra at maximum light. Investigating current
explosion models shows that observations typically require a shallower decrease
in the $^{56}$Ni mass towards the outer ejecta than is produced for models of a
given $^{56}$Ni mass.
http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif
