How to measure galaxy star formation histories II: Nonparametric models. (arXiv:1811.03637v1 [astro-ph.GA])
How to measure galaxy star formation histories II: Nonparametric models. (arXiv:1811.03637v1 [astro-ph.GA]) <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Leja_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">Joel Leja</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Carnall_A/0/1/0/all/0/1">Adam C. Carnall</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Johnson_B/0/1/0/all/0/1">Benjamin D. Johnson</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Conroy_C/0/1/0/all/0/1">Charlie Conroy</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Speagle_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">Joshua S. Speagle</a> Nonparametric star formation histories (SFHs) have long promised to be the “gold standard” for galaxy SED modeling as they are flexible enough to describe the full diversity of SFH shapes, whereas parametric models rule out a significant fraction of these shapes {it a priori}. However, this flexibility isn’t fully constrained even with high-quality observations, making it critical to choose a well-motivated prior. Here we use the SED-fitting code Prospector to explore the effect of differentRead More →