On the mass mismatch between simulations and weak-lensing measurements. (arXiv:1906.00975v1 [astro-ph.CO])
On the mass mismatch between simulations and weak-lensing measurements. (arXiv:1906.00975v1 [astro-ph.CO]) <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Svensmark_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">Jacob Svensmark</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Martizzi_D/0/1/0/all/0/1">Davide Martizzi</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Agnello_A/0/1/0/all/0/1">Adriano Agnello</a> The recently discovered discrepancy between galaxy mass measurements from weak lensing and predictions from abundance matching questions our understanding of cosmology, or of the galaxy-halo connection, or of both. We re-examined this tension by considering, as models, different cosmological simulations in the Illustris suite. We produced excess profiles $RDeltaSigma$ from subhalo snapshots at different redshifts in Illustris-1 and IllustrisTNG (TNG100 and TNG300) simulations, enabling a direct comparison with weak-lensing measurements. We separate the individual contributions of stars, dark matter and gas within $approx1$ Mpc (comovingRead More →