Planes of satellites around Milky Way/M31-mass galaxies in the FIRE simulations and comparisons with the Local Group. (arXiv:2010.08571v2 [astro-ph.GA] UPDATED)
<a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Samuel_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">Jenna Samuel</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Wetzel_A/0/1/0/all/0/1">Andrew Wetzel</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Chapman_S/0/1/0/all/0/1">Sierra Chapman</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Tollerud_E/0/1/0/all/0/1">Erik Tollerud</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Hopkins_P/0/1/0/all/0/1">Philip F. Hopkins</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Boylan_Kolchin_M/0/1/0/all/0/1">Michael Boylan-Kolchin</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Bailin_J/0/1/0/all/0/1">Jeremy Bailin</a>, <a href="http://arxiv.org/find/astro-ph/1/au:+Faucher_Giguere_C/0/1/0/all/0/1">Claude-Andr&#xe9; Faucher-Gigu&#xe8;re</a>

We examine the prevalence, longevity, and causes of planes of satellite dwarf
galaxies, as observed in the Local Group. We use 14 Milky
Way/Andromeda-(MW/M31) mass host galaxies from the FIRE-2 simulations. We
select the 14 most massive satellites by stellar mass within 300 kpc of each
host and correct for incompleteness from the foreground galactic disc when
comparing to the MW. We find that MW-like planes as spatially thin and/or
kinematically coherent as observed are uncommon, but they do exist in our
simulations. Spatially thin planes occur in 1-2 per cent of snapshots during
$z=0-0.2$, and kinematically coherent planes occur in 5 per cent of snapshots.
These planes are generally transient, surviving for less than 500 Myr. However,
if we select hosts with an LMC-like satellite near first pericentre, the
fraction of snapshots with MW-like planes increases dramatically to 7-16 per
cent, with lifetimes of 0.7-1 Gyr, likely because of group accretion of
satellites. We find that M31’s satellite distribution is much more common:
M31’s satellites lie within about 1 sigma of the simulation median for every
plane metric we consider. We find no significant difference in average
satellite planarity for isolated hosts versus hosts in LG-like pairs. Baryonic
and dark matter-only simulations exhibit similar levels of planarity, even
though baryonic subhaloes are less centrally concentrated within their host
haloes. We conclude that planes of satellites are not a strong challenge to
LCDM cosmology.

We examine the prevalence, longevity, and causes of planes of satellite dwarf
galaxies, as observed in the Local Group. We use 14 Milky
Way/Andromeda-(MW/M31) mass host galaxies from the FIRE-2 simulations. We
select the 14 most massive satellites by stellar mass within 300 kpc of each
host and correct for incompleteness from the foreground galactic disc when
comparing to the MW. We find that MW-like planes as spatially thin and/or
kinematically coherent as observed are uncommon, but they do exist in our
simulations. Spatially thin planes occur in 1-2 per cent of snapshots during
$z=0-0.2$, and kinematically coherent planes occur in 5 per cent of snapshots.
These planes are generally transient, surviving for less than 500 Myr. However,
if we select hosts with an LMC-like satellite near first pericentre, the
fraction of snapshots with MW-like planes increases dramatically to 7-16 per
cent, with lifetimes of 0.7-1 Gyr, likely because of group accretion of
satellites. We find that M31’s satellite distribution is much more common:
M31’s satellites lie within about 1 sigma of the simulation median for every
plane metric we consider. We find no significant difference in average
satellite planarity for isolated hosts versus hosts in LG-like pairs. Baryonic
and dark matter-only simulations exhibit similar levels of planarity, even
though baryonic subhaloes are less centrally concentrated within their host
haloes. We conclude that planes of satellites are not a strong challenge to
LCDM cosmology.

http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif