Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc~VI” by El-Maaref et al., [Indian J. Phys. {bf 91} 1029 (2017)]. (arXiv:2001.05359v1 [physics.atom-ph])

Comment on “Energy levels, oscillator strengths, and transition probabilities for sulfur-like scandium, Sc~VI” by El-Maaref et al., [Indian J. Phys. {bf 91} 1029 (2017)]. (arXiv:2001.05359v1 [physics.atom-ph])
<a href="http://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Aggarwal_K/0/1/0/all/0/1">K M Aggarwal</a>

In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the
recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [{em Indian J. Phys.} {bf 91}
1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and
lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of
S-like Sc~VI.

In this comment, through our independent calculations, we assess that the
recently reported results of El-Maaref et al. [{em Indian J. Phys.} {bf 91}
1029 (2017)] for energy levels, oscillator strengths, radiative rates, and
lifetimes are inaccurate and unreliable for several levels and transitions of
S-like Sc~VI.

http://arxiv.org/icons/sfx.gif

Comments are closed.